Bgee (data) - bgee-data

Grade
The grade for the resource as automatically determined by the criteria violations.
1
Description
A full description of the resource from the resource itself, if possible.
Bgee is a database to retrieve and compare gene expression patterns in multiple animal species, produced from multiple data types (RNA-Seq, Affymetrix, in situ hybridization, and EST data).
Last curated
(Optional) The ISO 8601 date of when the resource was last curated.
Unknown
Location
URL for the resource.
http://bgee.org
Source type
(Optional) How the resource relates to the data it contains. Current allowable entries are: "unknown", "repository", "source", "integrator", and "warehouse".
TBD
Curation status
Whether or not annotation is complete on this resource. Current allowable entries are: "complete", "incomplete", and "nonpublic".
complete
Field
The area of research for the resource.
biomedical
Type
The type of data the resource contains.
x-species
Categories
(Optional) Tags to describe the resource and its data.
expression data
Access
(Optional) Links to the resource's data.
download
License
The license that is used by the resource. We use SPDX where we can or: "inconsistent", "public domain", "unlicensed", "all rights reserved", or "custom".
unlicensed
License type
The type of license that is being used. This will be to define compatible data pools in the future; we only use the grossest terms now. If it is not known "unknown" is used. Current possible values are: "unknown", "unlicensed", "copyleft", "permissive", "public domain", "copyright", "restrictive", or "private pool".
copyright
License location
(Optional) The link to the resource license.
TBD
Focused curation
(Optional) Setting this flag to true indicates that the licensing was combinatorially complicated enough (as is the case in some commercial licenses) that the curator chose to wear a single "hat" during the process. From the site text: "While we try to cover as much of the licensing possibilities of a data resource that we can, in a few cases we may choose a particular "hat" to wear while evaluating to prevent a combinatorial explosion, which may also reduce the clarity of our curations for the community. In these cases, we may take on the role of a (1) non-commercial (2) academic (3) group that is (4) based in the US and trying to (5) create an aggregating resource, noting that other entities may have different results in the license commentary."
false
Issues
(Optional) Structured issues with the license. For every issue discovered with a resource, there should be a corresponding item in the license-issues field that marks the /exact/ violation, along with any comments. This field can be used by resources as the first step to improvement, as well as clarify any surrounding circumstances. Any issues or thoughts about a resource that do not slot into one of the criteria violations can go into the license-commentary field.
Criteria A.1.2: After some search we were unable to determine the license of the non-ontology portions of the Bgee data. No explicit license statements were apparent, causing a cascade of criteria violations. In spite of this, access itself is clear, so one star is awarded accordingly for C.
Commentary
(Optional) Further commentary on the license, possibly including the though process of the curations and things like locations of additional licenses.
• As of two years ago, they seem to want to migrate over to CC BY, but after some searching, it could not be cited on their main data portal: https://think-lab.github.io/d/82/#15
• They do not seem to me looking at the remix affects of licenses of their own data (http://bgee.org/?page=source).
• Assuming they have defaulted to ARR.
Controversial
(Optional) Marker noting that there was some extended internal discussion or controversy about the evaluation of the licensing terms. If this is marked at "true", the controversy, or a link to a permanent archive of the controversy, must be sufficiently contained in the "license-commentary" to reconstruct the issues.
false
Contacts
(Optional) Resource contact information, link, email, or whatever is public.
Bgee@isb-sib.ch
Grants
(Optional) Semi-structured list of supporting grants.
TBD

All copyrightable materials on this site are © 2017 the (Re)usable Data Project under the CC-BY 4.0 license.
ReusableData.org is funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) OT3 TR002019 as part of the Biomedical Data Translator project.
The (Re)usable Data Project would like to acknowledge the assistance of many more people than can be listed here. Please visit the about page for the full list.