ChEMBL - chembl

Grade
The grade for the resource as automatically determined by the criteria violations.
3
Description
A full description of the resource from the resource itself, if possible.
ChEMBL is a database of bioactive drug-like small molecules, it contains 2-D structures, calculated properties (e.g. logP, Molecular Weight, Lipinski Parameters, etc.) and abstracted bioactivities (e.g. binding constants, pharmacology and ADMET data).
Last curated
(Optional) The ISO 8601 date of when the resource was last curated.
2017-12-03
Location
URL for the resource.
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/
Source type
(Optional) How the resource relates to the data it contains. Current allowable entries are: "unknown", "repository", "source", "integrator", and "warehouse".
source
Curation status
Whether or not annotation is complete on this resource. Current allowable entries are: "complete", "incomplete", and "nonpublic".
complete
Field
The area of research for the resource.
biology
Type
The type of data the resource contains.
biochemical
Categories
(Optional) Tags to describe the resource and its data.
bioactive drug-like small molecules
Access
(Optional) Links to the resource's data.
download
api
License
The license that is used by the resource. We use SPDX where we can or: "inconsistent", "public domain", "unlicensed", "all rights reserved", or "custom".
CC-BY-SA-3.0
License type
The type of license that is being used. This will be to define compatible data pools in the future; we only use the grossest terms now. If it is not known "unknown" is used. Current possible values are: "unknown", "unlicensed", "copyleft", "permissive", "public domain", "copyright", "restrictive", or "private pool".
copyleft
License location
(Optional) The link to the resource license.
ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/chembl/ChEMBLdb/releases/chembl_23/LICENSE
Focused curation
(Optional) Setting this flag to true indicates that the licensing was combinatorially complicated enough (as is the case in some commercial licenses) that the curator chose to wear a single "hat" during the process. From the site text: "While we try to cover as much of the licensing possibilities of a data resource that we can, in a few cases we may choose a particular "hat" to wear while evaluating to prevent a combinatorial explosion, which may also reduce the clarity of our curations for the community. In these cases, we may take on the role of a (1) non-commercial (2) academic (3) group that is (4) based in the US and trying to (5) create an aggregating resource, noting that other entities may have different results in the license commentary."
false
Issues
(Optional) Structured issues with the license. For every issue discovered with a resource, there should be a corresponding item in the license-issues field that marks the /exact/ violation, along with any comments. This field can be used by resources as the first step to improvement, as well as clarify any surrounding circumstances. Any issues or thoughts about a resource that do not slot into one of the criteria violations can go into the license-commentary field.
Criteria D.1.2: CC SA prevents some types of reuse, such and modification and redistribution with data from different license types.
Criteria E.1.2: CC SA prevents all parties from reusing the data as D.1.2.
Commentary
(Optional) Further commentary on the license, possibly including the though process of the curations and things like locations of additional licenses.
• There was no centralized licensing/terms information on the main site, but all download FTP directories we looked at contained terms for the CC SA 3.0; we used as single example as the license link.
Controversial
(Optional) Marker noting that there was some extended internal discussion or controversy about the evaluation of the licensing terms. If this is marked at "true", the controversy, or a link to a permanent archive of the controversy, must be sufficiently contained in the "license-commentary" to reconstruct the issues.
false
Contacts
(Optional) Resource contact information, link, email, or whatever is public.
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/support/
Grants
(Optional) Semi-structured list of supporting grants.
2014-2019: The ChEMBL Database, Wellcome Trust (Strategic Award WT104104/Z/14/Z).
2009-date: The member states of EMBL.
2016-2022: European Commission Horizon 2020 Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment in the 21 st Century EU-ToxRisk (681002)
2015-2019: Coordinated Research Infrastructures Building Enduring Life-science Services CORBEL (654248)
2014-2017: The Knowledge Management Center (KMC) for the Illuminating the Druggable Genome (IDG) program funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Fund. (Grant No. U54CA189205)
2014-2017: The Center for Therapeutic Target Validation (CTTV008)
2013-2018: European Commission FP7 HeCaTos – Safety prediction (602156)

All copyrightable materials on this site are © 2019 the (Re)usable Data Project under the CC-BY 4.0 license.
The (Re)usable Data Project is funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) OT3 TR002019 as part of the Biomedical Data Translator project and U24TR002306 as part of the CTSA Program National Center for Data to Health (CD2H).
The (Re)usable Data Project would like to acknowledge the assistance of many more people than can be listed here. Please visit the about page for the full list.